Skip to main content
· 2/27/1982

State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Martin

Citations

  • 641 P.2d 1011
  • 230 Kan. 747
  • 73 Oil & Gas Rep. 419
  • 1982 Kan. LEXIS 230

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that “or” and “and” are frequently misused; the court will construe the language to reflect the true meaning and intent of a statute
  • noting that \or\ and \and\ are frequently misused; the court will construe the language to reflect the true meaning and intent of a statute
  • finding an exception to that rule when a typographic error contradicted clear legislative intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.