· 2/27/1982
State Ex Rel. Stephan v. Martin
Citations
- 641 P.2d 1011
- 230 Kan. 747
- 73 Oil & Gas Rep. 419
- 1982 Kan. LEXIS 230
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that “or” and “and” are frequently misused; the court will construe the language to reflect the true meaning and intent of a statute
- noting that \or\ and \and\ are frequently misused; the court will construe the language to reflect the true meaning and intent of a statute
- finding an exception to that rule when a typographic error contradicted clear legislative intent
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Holmes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.