State Ex Rel. State Highway Department v. Kistler-Collister Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• The Court held that there was no error in the trial court’s admission of evidence of future plans for a condemned property, with the proviso that “mere frustration of the owner’s hopes or plans for the future is a noneompensable element of damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).