· 7/18/1966
State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.
Citations
- 417 P.2d 68
- 76 N.M. 587
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the benefit of construction of a highway which enhances the value of a remainder of a tract of land is to be included in the determination of the value of the land after the taking
- holding that the benefit of construction of a highway which enhances the value of a remainder of a tract of land is to be included in the determination of the value of the land after the taking
- “Instructions which are repetitious or which unduly emphasize certain portions of the case should not be given.”
- \Instructions which are repetitious or which unduly emphasize certain portions of the case should not be given.\
- “Instructions which are repetitious or which unduly emphasize certain portions of the case should not be given.”
- verdict rendered was outside the range of evidence of damages introduced at trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Noble, Carmody, Cpiavez
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.