Skip to main content
· 7/18/1966

State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Citations

  • 417 P.2d 68
  • 76 N.M. 587

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the benefit of construction of a highway which enhances the value of a remainder of a tract of land is to be included in the determination of the value of the land after the taking
  • holding that the benefit of construction of a highway which enhances the value of a remainder of a tract of land is to be included in the determination of the value of the land after the taking
  • “Instructions which are repetitious or which unduly emphasize certain portions of the case should not be given.”
  • \Instructions which are repetitious or which unduly emphasize certain portions of the case should not be given.\
  • “Instructions which are repetitious or which unduly emphasize certain portions of the case should not be given.”
  • verdict rendered was outside the range of evidence of damages introduced at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Noble, Carmody, Cpiavez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.