State ex rel. State Bank v. Carroll

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “There is no question howeverl that this court has subject matter jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (2006
• 'There is no question, however, that this court has subject matter jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (2006
• “There is no question, however, that this court has subject matter jurisdiction under the Tucker Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1491 (2006), over claims, such as the present one, seeking to recover statutory interest on income tax refunds.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).