Washington Supreme Court· 2/24/1896
State ex rel. Starrett v. James
Citations
- 14 Wash. 82
- 44 P. 116
- 1896 Wash. LEXIS 311
Syllabus
<p>MANDAMUS— WHES LIES — PARTIES IN INTEREST.</p> <p>TJnder the rule that mandamus will lie only at the instance of parties in interest, the writ will not issue at the suit of two directors of a school district against the third director to compel him to sign warrants for the payment of the salaries of certain teachers.</p>
Judges: Anders, Dunbar, Gordon, Hoyt, Scott
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Robinson Township School District v. HoughtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-12-29· cited 56×
- State ex rel. Brown v. McQuadeWashington Supreme Court· 1905-01-16· cited 45×
- Barry v. Phoenix Union High SchoolArizona Supreme Court· 1948-09-20· cited 15×
- Wiecking v. State ex rel. CoachmanSupreme Court of Florida· 1913-06-25· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.