Skip to main content
· 12/19/2018

State ex rel. Speedway v. Wray

Citations

  • 113 N.E.3d 563
  • 2018 Ohio 5085
  • 154 Ohio St. 3d 1457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing a six-month old district court order restricting communication to class members with review of the final judgment
  • refusing to find prejudice when \irreplaceable” knowledge of deceased supervisors was \irreplaceable” only because of defendant’s negligence in preserving alternate sources of information
  • reviewing a six-month old district court order restricting communication to class members with review of the final judgment
  • because claims of class representatives were properly before court, district court may not dismiss class claims and claims of other named plaintiffs who did not file EEOC complaint
  • “A party cannot assert the defense of laches merely because it has failed to preserve evidence despite knowledge of a pending claim”
  • rule’s explicit grant of authority to the trial court to control the conduct and settlement of the action outweighs party’s right to encourage common participation in litigation of claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.