State ex rel. Southern Publishing Co. v. Ellis

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that we are precluded from 2 1 reviewing underlying removal order on petition for review of 2 denial of motion to reopen
• stating that when considering the conditions of confinement, 14 courts should consider the amount of time to which the prisoner was subjected to the 15 condition
• “[Existing sources] faced no NSR obligations-in the common phrase, they were ‘grandfathered’ .... ”
• referring to the EPA’s adoption of the 1982 emissions increase rule
• “Congress’s failure to use such an express incorporation of prior regulations for ‘modification’ cuts against” any suggestion that “Congress intended to incorporate” into the Act the “preexisting regulatory definition” of “modification”
• “[A] prosecutor may not assert blanket absolute 14 immunity by labeling all his actions as within a particular prosecutorial function.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).