Skip to main content
· 10/11/2000

State Ex Rel. SOSCF v. Thomas

Citations

  • 12 P.3d 537
  • 170 Or. App. 383

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the father’s counsel was adequate after reviewing the record developed at the trial court level
  • reviewing party’s request at trial to continue trial because party was not prepared to proceed for an abuse of discretion
  • reviewing party's request at trial to continue trial because party was not prepared to proceed for an abuse of discretion
  • “The best-interests determination can prevent termination, even if the statutory grounds for termination are established”
  • under the two-step analysis, the “best-interests determination can prevent termination, even if the statutory grounds for termination are established”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Landau, Presiding Judge, and Deits, Chief Judge, and Wollheim, Judge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.