· 12/21/1966
State Ex Rel. Smith v. Bohannan
Citations
- 421 P.2d 877
- 101 Ariz. 520
- 1966 Ariz. LEXIS 387
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting, in a contractual dispute, that the state is a distinct legal entity with the power to sue and be sued
- noting, in a contractual dispute, that the state is a distinct legal entity with the power to sue and be sued
- finding no impermissible splitting of a cause of action in state's quo warranto action because the state is a separate legal entity that has power to sue
- finding no impermissible splitting of a cause of action in state’s quo warranto action because the state is a separate legal entity that has power to sue
- “It is, we believe, accepted without dissent that public officers must have no personal interest in transactions with the government which they represent.”
- “Courts will not read into a statute something which is not within the manifest intent of the legislature as gathered from the statute itself.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.