Skip to main content
· 12/21/1966

State Ex Rel. Smith v. Bohannan

Citations

  • 421 P.2d 877
  • 101 Ariz. 520
  • 1966 Ariz. LEXIS 387

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting, in a contractual dispute, that the state is a distinct legal entity with the power to sue and be sued
  • noting, in a contractual dispute, that the state is a distinct legal entity with the power to sue and be sued
  • finding no impermissible splitting of a cause of action in state's quo warranto action because the state is a separate legal entity that has power to sue
  • finding no impermissible splitting of a cause of action in state’s quo warranto action because the state is a separate legal entity that has power to sue
  • “It is, we believe, accepted without dissent that public officers must have no personal interest in transactions with the government which they represent.”
  • “Courts will not read into a statute something which is not within the manifest intent of the legislature as gathered from the statute itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.