State ex rel. Simmonds v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute is mandatory if it addresses matter of substance. If it is simply a matter of convenience, it is considered directory
• holding that statute is mandatory if it addresses matter of substance. If it is simply a matter of convenience, it is considered directory
• noncompliance with directory statute ‘‘will not invalidate any future proceedings contem- plated by the statute unless the noncompliance has prejudiced the opposing party’’
• noncompliance with mandatory provision will invalidate any future proceedings contemplated by statute
• noncompliance with mandatory provision will invalidate any future proceedings con- templated by statute
• mandatory statutory provisions are \typically\ subject to waiver

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).