Skip to main content
· 12/22/1993

State Ex Rel. Schrunk v. Metz

Citations

  • 867 P.2d 503
  • 125 Or. App. 405
  • 1993 Ore. App. LEXIS 2124

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding that prompt post-seizure hearings are needed to protect an ownership interest in commercial property
  • deciding that prompt post-seizure hearings are needed to protect an ownership interest in commercial property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rossman, De Muniz Leeson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.