Skip to main content
· 7/15/1961

State ex rel. Satterfield v. Cochran

Citations

  • 133 So. 2d 324

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating, “a post-trial motion that is infirm—whether for untimeliness or other reasons—does not toll the time for appeal.”
  • trial court abused its discretion in denying plaintiff’s request for restoration nunc pro tunc of right to file direct appeal, where (1) trial court granted summary judgment for defendants, (2) plaintiff improvidently filed motion for post-trial relief, (3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.