Skip to main content
· 7/3/1936

State ex rel. Rosenstahl v. Storey

Citations

  • 144 Kan. 311
  • 58 P.2d 1090
  • 1936 Kan. LEXIS 239

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that evidence of postoffense conduct that included flight and disposal of firearms supported the defendant’s conviction of second-degree murder
  • affirming conviction for second-degree murder that was predicated on an aiding and abetting theory and holding that duress is not a valid defense to second- degree murder even though the defendant did not commit the killing
  • “Intent to kill may be inferred from all the facts in evidence, including the use of a deadly weapon.”
  • “Intent to kill may be inferred from all the facts in evidence, including the use of a deadly weapon.”
  • “Intent to kill may be inferred from all the facts in evidence, including the use of a deadly weapon.”
  • “[I]t is well established that duress is not a defense to homicide.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harvey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.