Skip to main content
· 2/9/2005

State Ex Rel. Romley v. Hauser

Citations

  • 105 P.3d 1158
  • 209 Ariz. 539
  • 445 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 31
  • 2005 Ariz. LEXIS 15

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • observing statute headings are not law, but the title may be used to aid in interpretation where ambiguity exists
  • observing statute headings are not law, but the title may be used to aid in interpretation where ambiguity exists
  • noting that statutory titles do not alter a statute's plain meaning
  • declining to find a statute’s title persuasive when it was inconsistent with the text of the statute
  • finding similarly phrased predecessor statute to include remote, non-dangerous prior convictions
  • finding similarly phrased predecessor statute to include remote, non-dangerous prior convictions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hurwitz, Jones, McGregor, Berch, Ryan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.