· 2/9/2005
State Ex Rel. Romley v. Hauser
Citations
- 105 P.3d 1158
- 209 Ariz. 539
- 445 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 31
- 2005 Ariz. LEXIS 15
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- observing statute headings are not law, but the title may be used to aid in interpretation where ambiguity exists
- observing statute headings are not law, but the title may be used to aid in interpretation where ambiguity exists
- noting that statutory titles do not alter a statute's plain meaning
- declining to find a statute’s title persuasive when it was inconsistent with the text of the statute
- finding similarly phrased predecessor statute to include remote, non-dangerous prior convictions
- finding similarly phrased predecessor statute to include remote, non-dangerous prior convictions
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hurwitz, Jones, McGregor, Berch, Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.