State Ex Rel. Rojas v. Wilkes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that funds with which defendant’s family retained private counsel irrelevant to defendant’s right as indigent to have necessary expert assistance provided at state’s expense
• holding that funds with which defendant’s family retained private counsel irrelevant to defendant’s right as indigent to have necessary expert assistance provided at state’s expense
• holding that funds with which defendant's family retained private counsel irrelevant to defendant's right as indigent to have necessary expert assistance provided at state's expense
• stating funds with which defendant’s family retained private counsel were irrelevant to defendant’s right to have necessary expert assistance provided at the state’s expense
• financial assistance provided by third parties which allows a defendant to retain private counsel is not relevant to the defendant’s right to have expert assistance provided at public expense
• financial assistance provided by third parties which allows a defendant to retain private counsel is not relevant to the defendant’s right to have expert assistance provided at public expense

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).