State ex rel. Robertson v. O'Donnell
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 4475
Syllabus
Prohibition, personal jurisdiction, minimum contacts, waiver, Civ.R. 12(H)(1) and adequate remedy at law through appeal. This court concluded that the conflicting allegations about whether there were sufficient minimum contacts among the relator, Ohio, and the underlying case vested the respondent judge with sufficient jurisdiction to determine his own jurisdiction and, if appropriate, the relator has an adequate remedy at law through appeal. Pursuant to Civ.R. 12(H)(1), the defense of personal jurisdiction is preserved if a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction is made.
Judges: Ryan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.