· 1/4/1980
State Ex Rel. Riley v. Martin
Citations
- 262 S.E.2d 404
- 274 S.C. 106
- 1980 S.C. LEXIS 257
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding article V, section 1 clearly does not preclude a statutory court of appeals, then citing the West Committee for legislative history
- concluding article V, section 1 clearly does not preclude a statutory court of appeals, then citing the West Committee for legislative history
- purpose of legislation is to prevent legislators from deriving directly or indirectly any pecuniary benefit from the enactment
- purpose of legislation is to prevent legislators from deriving directly or indirectly any pecuniary benefit from the enactment
- action brought by Attorney General and Governor challenging legislation creating Court of Appeals
- action brought by Attorney General and Governor challenging legislation creating Court of Appeals
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.