Skip to main content
· 1/4/1980

State Ex Rel. Riley v. Martin

Citations

  • 262 S.E.2d 404
  • 274 S.C. 106
  • 1980 S.C. LEXIS 257

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding article V, section 1 clearly does not preclude a statutory court of appeals, then citing the West Committee for legislative history
  • concluding article V, section 1 clearly does not preclude a statutory court of appeals, then citing the West Committee for legislative history
  • purpose of legislation is to prevent legislators from deriving directly or indirectly any pecuniary benefit from the enactment
  • purpose of legislation is to prevent legislators from deriving directly or indirectly any pecuniary benefit from the enactment
  • action brought by Attorney General and Governor challenging legislation creating Court of Appeals
  • action brought by Attorney General and Governor challenging legislation creating Court of Appeals

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.