Skip to main content
· 8/11/1915

State ex rel. Ridgely v. Superior Court

Citations

  • 86 Wash. 584

Syllabus

<p>Receivers — Appointment — Notice. An order appointing a receiver without notice, and without limiting the appointment to a day certain fixed by the court upon which a hearing can be had, is without jurisdiction and void.</p> <p>Same — Appointment—Proceedings—Yaridity—Estoppel. Where an order appointing a receiver without notice was void for want of jurisdiction, a motion to quash the order of appointment, and acquiescence in the order of the court denying the motion, does not estop the party from questioning the subsequent acts of the court in issuing a writ of assistance to put the receiver in possession; since the appointment being void, the court was without jurisdiction to issue the writ'of assistance.</p>

Judges: Fullerton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.