State ex rel. Repp v. Best
Citations
- 174 Ohio St. 3d 360
- 237 N.E.3d 71
- 2023 Ohio 3924
Syllabus
Quo warranto—Prohibition—Relator failed to allege facts showing that judicial office is being unlawfully held and that he was entitled to hold the office—Relator's suspension from practice of law created vacancy in judicial office under R.C. 1901.10(B), thereby allowing governor to appoint another person to the office under Article IV, Section 13 of Ohio Constitution—Motion for judgment on pleadings granted and quo warranto claim dismissed—Prohibition claim and other requests for relief dismissed sua sponte
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that Iqbal did not alter the 12 “obligation” to construe pro se pleadings liberally
- holding that pro se complaints 15 should continue to be liberally construed after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)
- holding that pro se complaints should continue to be liberally 23 construed after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)
- holding that pro se complaints should continue to be liberally 27 construed after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)
- holding that pro se complaints should 21 continue to be liberally construed after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)
- holding that pro se complaints 19 should continue to be liberally construed after Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.