State ex rel. Reigert v. State Med. Bd. of Ohio

Citations

• 2025 Ohio 5868

Syllabus

The trial court did not err by finding that Reigert lacked standing to file a complaint for a writ of mandamus in this case. Alternatively, the trial court did not err by concluding that the Board complied with its statutory mandate under R.C. 4731.22(F)(1). Because a decision to reopen Reigert's complaint is discretionary, Reigert cannot demonstrate a clear legal right to mandamus. Judgment affirmed.