State Ex Rel. Register-Herald v. Canterbury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• seems to limit statute’s application to only situations where information is released by medical personnel
• seems to limit statute's application to only situations where information is released by medical personnel
• “In this case, it is logical to treat the appeal . . . as a prohibition. . . .”
• “In this case, it is logical to treat the appeal filed by Mr. Thomas as a prohibition since it challenges the scope of the injunction entered by the circuit court.”
• “In this case, it is logical to treat the appeal filed by Mr. Thomas as a prohibition since it challenges the scope of the injunction entered by the circuit court.”
• prohibition granted to reverse order constituting prior restraint against newspaper

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).