Skip to main content
· 3/14/1904

State ex rel. Rees v. Foster

Citations

  • 111 La. 1087
  • 36 So. 200
  • 1904 La. LEXIS 600

Syllabus

<p>COURTS—JURISDICTION—PRIMARY ELECTIONS.</p> <p>1. The courts of this state are without jurisdiction to entertain an action contesting the validity or result of a primary election, in the absence of express statutory authorization.</p> <p>2. The question belongs to the political department of the government. See Const. 1898, arts. 16, 17; State v. Judge, 13 La. Ann. 89; State v. Police Jury, 6 South. 777, 41 La. Ann. 846.</p> <p>(Syllabus by the Court.)</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because actual knowledge is not at issue here, the question is whether Wilson was on inquiry notice of Huuuge’s Terms of Use.”
  • “[E]ven □□ □ website or app contains just a hyperlink to the terms, courts have been more than willing to find a valid agreement if the user is still forced somehow to manifest their assent to the terms, as opposed to passively browsing the site.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Land

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.