· 8/11/1960
State ex rel. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Washington Public Service Commission
Citations
- 57 Wash. 2d 32
- 354 P.2d 711
- 1960 Wash. LEXIS 445
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding the distinction between accidently unearned statements in Patane and a voluntary, post failure-to-honor-a-request-for-counsel dis-positive, and holding that the fruits of such statements are inadmissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Finley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.