Skip to main content
· 8/11/1960

State ex rel. Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. Washington Public Service Commission

Citations

  • 57 Wash. 2d 32
  • 354 P.2d 711
  • 1960 Wash. LEXIS 445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the distinction between accidently unearned statements in Patane and a voluntary, post failure-to-honor-a-request-for-counsel dis-positive, and holding that the fruits of such statements are inadmissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Finley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.