State ex rel. Race v. Cranney
Citations
- 30 Wash. 594
- 71 P. 50
- 1902 Wash. LEXIS 727
Syllabus
<p>APPEAL-INTEREST OE APPELLANT.</p> <p>Where one has sufficient interest to be made a party to an action, be cannot be denied an appealable interest in the cause, should the judgment be against hijn.</p> <p>MANDAMUS — ISSUANCE OE TAX DEED — PARTIES TO PROCEEDING.</p> <p>• Upon a petition for mandamus to compel a public officer to convey lands purchased at tax sale, private persons who claim an interest in the land are' proper party defendants, under the provisions of our code which permit the rights of all persons in the subject-matter in controversy to be determined in one action.</p> <p>SAME-EIGHT OF REDEMPTION.</p> <p>A county treasurer is warranted in refusing to execute a conveyance to the purchaser at a delinquent tax sale, although the latter has tendered all the taxes due and is fully entitled to a deed, if before conveyance full redemption is made by the owner, since the statute governing tax sales permits redemption therefrom at any time before the execution of the tax deed.</p>
Judges: Dunbar
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State ex rel. Brown v. McQuadeWashington Supreme Court· 1905-01-16· cited 45×
- Bolster v. Attorney GeneralMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1940-06-27· cited 29×
- State Ex Rel. Bond v. StateWashington Supreme Court· 1962-02-01· cited 22×
- State v. CarrollWashington Supreme Court· 1910-02-03· cited 20×
- State ex rel. Taro v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court· 1918-04-27· cited 16×
- In Re SamaniegoE.D. Washington· 1998-08-13· cited 14×
- State ex rel. Forstell v. OtisWashington Supreme Court· 1924-11-25· cited 12×
- State ex rel. Barto v. Board of Drainage Commissioners of District No. 1Washington Supreme Court· 1907-06-22· cited 11×
- Leonard v. BelangerNevada Supreme Court· 1950-09-11· cited 10×
- Robertson v. BozarthSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1922-09-26· cited 10×
- Ribero v. CallawayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1948-08-05· cited 9×
- State v. LampreyWashington Supreme Court· 1910-01-22· cited 8×
- State ex rel. Howland v. Olympia Veneer Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1924-10-23· cited 6×
- State ex rel. Board of County Commissioners v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1910-05-06· cited 6×
- Temple v. FeeneyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-07-19· cited 5×
- Kahn v. ThorpeWashington Supreme Court· 1906-08-22· cited 5×
- In re the Estate of BayerWashington Supreme Court· 1919-11-22· cited 4×
- Stockand v. HallWashington Supreme Court· 1909-07-10· cited 3×
- State v. Middle Kittitas Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court· 1910-01-08· cited 3×
- State ex rel. Clapp v. UrquhartWashington Supreme Court· 1919-08-19· cited 2×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.