State Ex Rel. Proctor v. Messina

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that an ex parte interview does not qualify as being in the course of “judicial proceedings” under HIPAA, therefore a trial court lacks authority to issue an order under HIPAA allowing an ex parte interview
• interpreting HIPAA as not allowing ex parte communications “because the trial court has no general oversight of the meeting or any control over it”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).