Skip to main content
· 10/10/2003

State Ex Rel. Pritt v. Vickers

Citations

  • 588 S.E.2d 210
  • 214 W. Va. 221
  • 2003 W. Va. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “the matter of judicial recusal and disqualification is a matter of discretion reposed solely in the presiding judge and the Chief Justice of this Court”
  • “Trial courts should not permit parties to obtain extensions absent a showing of good cause.”
  • \Trial courts should not permit parties to obtain extensions absent a showing of good cause.\
  • “Under Rule 16(b), it is mandatory that trial courts enter a scheduling order that limits the time to join parties, amend pleadings, file and hear motions, and complete discovery.”
  • “Because of our resolution of the scheduling order motion, we need not address the remaining issues presented by Ms. Pritt.”
  • essential purpose of discovery is development of issues and. efficient resolution of disputes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: John M. Hedges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.