Skip to main content

State ex rel. Pritt v. Indus. Comm.

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 1066

Syllabus

Because some evidence in the record supports the commission finding relator is medically capable of engaging in sustained remunerative employment of a sedentary nature and the relevant nonmedical disability factors do not preclude relator from currently engaging in such employment, the fact that the commission incorrectly relied on relator's non-allowed conditions as a basis for denying PTD in a separate portion of the order does not constitute grounds for the granting of a writ of mandamus. Writ denied.

Judges: Sadler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named State ex rel. Pritt v. Indus. Comm.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.