State Ex Rel. Price v. 2.7089 ACRES OF LAND, ETC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the key issue was whether the expert testimony on defendants’ damages for a taking “is admissible, since the testimony was based on a stated number of subdivision lots and their expected purchase price and since there was no reasonable probability of subdivision ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).