Skip to main content
· 4/25/2006

State Ex Rel. Petti v. Goodwin-Raftery

Citations

  • 190 S.W.3d 501
  • 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 536
  • 2006 WL 1071519

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • affirming dismissal despite appellants’ claim that the motion court should have first conducted an evidentiary hearing, where the information in the petition was adequate to determine that appellants’ claims lacked legal merit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dowd, Baker, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.