State ex rel. Paul v. Amiss

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We find that the Division’s determination that the findings of the hearing officer were not supported by competent substantial evidence was in error. The Division was, therefore, not free to reject the hearing officer’s findings that appellant acted as an independent contractor....”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).