Skip to main content
· 8/26/2008

State ex rel. Parker v. Lucas Cty. Job & Family Servs.

Citations

  • 119 Ohio St. 3d 1429
  • 892 N.E.2d 919

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Contrary to appellant's contentions, the amount in controversy in this case was not the damages which appellee might suffer if its suit for specific performance were denied. It was the value of the property sought to be acquired by the suit, in this case admittedly $7500.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.