Skip to main content
· 2/25/1997

State ex rel. Paige v. Goeke

Citations

  • 943 S.W.2d 749
  • 1997 Mo. App. LEXIS 304
  • 1997 WL 90859

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing complaint for failure to show that contract involving non-novel idea was supported by consideration
  • dismissing complaint for failure to show that contract involving non-novel idea was supported by consideration
  • denying recovery to a plaintiff claiming he provided valuable in formation, because his idea to increase profits by increasing prices “was not new, it was not original,” and was simply “call[ingj attention to a fact already known”
  • “No person can by contract monopolize an idea that is common and general to the whole world.”
  • idea to increase manufacturer profits by increasing wholesale price to retailers without increase in retail price merely a variant or derivative of an obvious or commonly known concept

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crahan, Crandall, Hoff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.