State ex rel. Pagett v. Superior Court
Citations
- 46 Wash. 35
- 89 P. 178
- 1907 Wash. LEXIS 553
Syllabus
<p>Eminent Domain — Procedure—Review—Certiorari. Certiorari lies to review an order adjudging necessity and public use in condemnation proceedings for a county road, as there is no remedy by appeal; the statute of appeals relating to proceedings in eminent domain permitting an appeal only from the award of damages, and Laws 1901, p. 213, allowing an appeal from adjudication of public use being unconstitutional because of defective title.</p> <p>Same — Scope and Questions Review able. Whether a use is a public use is a judicial question, and the same is subject to review on a writ of certiorari in condemnation proceedings.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no error where prosecutor explained legal doctrine of criminal responsibility of aiders and abettors to prospective jurors and then asked them if they would render a verdict of guilty of all necessary elements for conviction under doctrine present
- no error where prosecutor explained legal doctrine of criminal responsibility of aiders and abettors to prospective jurors and then asked them if they would render a verdict of guilty if all necessary elements for conviction under doctrine present
- no error where prosecutor explained legal doctrine of criminal responsibility of aiders and abettors to prospective jurors and then asked them if they would render a verdict of guilty of all necessary elements for conviction under doctrine present
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fullerton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.