New Mexico Supreme Court· 7/2/1925
State Ex Rel. Otto v. Field
Citations
- 241 P. 1027
- 31 N.M. 120
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- indicating that the case was “of great importance, not only to the litigant who seeks protection of the right he claims, but also it is of great public interest, because there is involved the policy and interest of the [S]tate as a trustee with respect to its school fund”
- New Mexico Commissioner of Public Lands has complete control over State lands
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bickley, Parker, Watson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State Ex Rel. King v. LyonsNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2011-01-24· cited 56×
- State ex rel. Rausch v. Amerada Petroleum Corp.North Dakota Supreme Court· 1951-08-09· cited 36×
- State Ex Rel. Del Curto v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1947-05-28· cited 34×
- Sproles v. McDonaldNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1962-06-05· cited 27×
- Burguete v. Del CurtoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1945-07-14· cited 27×
- Davidson v. EnfieldNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1931-10-06· cited 25×
- State v. WalkerNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1956-01-16· cited 23×
- State Ex Rel. McElroy v. VeselyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1935-12-16· cited 21×
- State ex rel. Richardson v. Fifth Judicial District Nominating CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court· 2007-05-18· cited 21×
- Vigil v. Penitentiary of New MexicoNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1948-07-19· cited 20×
- New Mexico and Arizona Land Company v. ElkinsD. New Mexico· 1956-02-06· cited 19×
- State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. Board of County CommissionersNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1962-02-28· cited 14×
- Terry v. Midwest Refining Co.Tenth Circuit· 1933-03-31· cited 13×
- Nye v. Board of Com'rs of Eddy CountyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1932-02-03· cited 12×
- Roe v. State Ex Rel. State Highway DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1985-12-02· cited 9×
- Dasburg v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1941-05-19· cited 9×
- Ellison v. EllisonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1944-02-15· cited 8×
- Jensen v. State Highway CommissionNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-03-03· cited 7×
- Zinn v. HampsonNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1956-09-06· cited 7×
- State Ex Rel. Walker v. HinkleNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1933-04-04· cited 7×
Cites
38 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co.Supreme Court· 1906-02-19· cited 1,300×
- Pennoyer v. McConnaughySupreme Court· 1891-04-20· cited 273×
- United States v. MooreSupreme Court· 1878-02-18· cited 260×
- Burke v. Southern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1914-06-22· cited 174×
- Hastings & Dakota Railroad v. WhitneySupreme Court· 1889-12-09· cited 154×
- Barden v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court· 1894-05-26· cited 151×
- United States v. PhilbrickSupreme Court· 1887-01-10· cited 94×
- Robertson v. DowningSupreme Court· 1888-05-14· cited 94×
- Heath v. WallaceSupreme Court· 1891-03-02· cited 91×
- McLaren v. FleischerSupreme Court· 1921-06-01· cited 78×
- Wyoming v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1921-03-28· cited 76×
- Dresel v. JordanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1870-03-15· cited 75×
- Brown v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1885-03-02· cited 74×
- United States v. GrahamSupreme Court· 1884-01-21· cited 60×
- Swendig v. Washington Water Power Co.Supreme Court· 1924-02-25· cited 58×
- United States v. Burlington & Missouri River R. Co.Supreme Court· 1879-03-18· cited 57×
- Smisson v. StateTexas Supreme Court· 1888-06-19· cited 50×
- Allen v. GilletteSupreme Court· 1888-05-14· cited 44×
- Stockley v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1923-01-02· cited 32×
- Pike v. State Board of Land CommissionersIdaho Supreme Court· 1911-02-02· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.