State ex rel. Onunwor v. Deputy Clerk of Courts
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 1685
Syllabus
R.C. 149.43(B)(8), Sup.R. 44-47, prospective application, criminal case records, public records. Because the relator's criminal case occurred prior to the effective date of Sup.R. 44-47, R.C. 149.43 controlled the relator's request for records from that case. Because the relator did not obtain the necessary judicial approval required by R.C. 149.43(B)(8), the relator was not entitled to the records.
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- the basis of McMillan’s “tail wagging the dog” concern was disavowed by the Supreme Court in Blakely
- the basis of McMillan 's \tail wagging the dog\ concern was disavowed by the Supreme Court in Blakely
- the basis of McMillan’s “tail wagging the dog” concern was disavowed by the Supreme Court in Blakely
- “Whenever an appellate court creates a new test, it is normally preferable to remand the case so that the trial judge can apply the proper legal standard to the facts in the first instance.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Celebrezze
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.