STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. FIELDS

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that nothing in Bruen allows the court to sidestep the text-and-history analysis and emphasizing that the courts “must undertake the text-and-history inquiry the Court so plainly announced and expounded upon at great length”
• noting Bruen left unresolved the “complicated issue” of whether the second amendment’s plain text covers felons
• “Nothing allows us to sidestep Bruen in the way the - 76 - government invites.”
• remanding “to the district court for a proper, fulsome analysis of the historical tradition supporting § 922(g)(1)”
• remanding to the district court to “undertake the Bruen analysis in the first 2 Case: 23-30152 Document: 00516946913 Page: 3 Date Filed: 10/27/2023 No. 23-30152 instance”
• finding felon-in-possession prohibition constitutional and remanding for historical analysis required by Bruen

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).