State ex rel. Nuccio v. Foti

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting county’s argument that refunds were not required because the funds had long since been expended and finding laches inapplicable to the extent there was no unreasonable delay in contesting the ordinance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).