State ex rel. Noling v. Doherty

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that insertion of key obtained from premises where the defendant was arrested into a nearby parked vehicle door lock did not violate either the federal or state constitution
• holding that insertion of key obtained from premises where the defendant was arrested into a nearby parked vehicle door lock did not violate either the federal or state constitution
• stating that police properly seized keys because they had a reasonable basis to conclude that they were relevant to the issue of defendant’s control over the premises
• the informant, already in custody for sale of drugs, explained their source and thus knew the statements in that regard could lead to his prosecution on drug charges
• the informant, already in custody for sale of drugs, explained their source and thus knew the statements in that regard could lead to his prosecution on drug charges
• police need \only a founded or reasonable suspicion to insert the key\ to see whether it fits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).