Skip to main content
· 10/29/1965

State ex rel. Nichols v. Zinn

Citations

  • 75 N.M. 508
  • 407 P.2d 53

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “No motion for new trial is necessary where the error relates to the judgment or 9 (...continued) in his untimely post-trial motions, those issues are waived and not preserved for purposes of appellate review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carmody

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.