· 7/12/1990
State Ex Rel. Neely v. Rodriguez
Citations
- 796 P.2d 876
- 165 Ariz. 74
- 65 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
- 1990 Ariz. LEXIS 197
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that this court cannot expand its statutory appellate jurisdiction by using its special action jurisdiction when a party has failed to timely file a notice of appeal
- recognizing the “strong Arizona policy against using extraordinary writs as substitutes for appeals”
- affirming the “strong Arizona policy against using extraordinary writs as substitutes for appeals”
- “ ‘Subject matter jurisdiction’ relates to the constitutional or statutory power of a court to decide a case.”
- “One of the equitable considerations involved in accepting special action jurisdiction is a petitioner’s showing of a need for speedy relief____”
- motion for rehearing did not suspend time limit to appeal from underlying order granting new trial
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Corcoran, Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Moeller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.