Skip to main content
· 7/12/1990

State Ex Rel. Neely v. Rodriguez

Citations

  • 796 P.2d 876
  • 165 Ariz. 74
  • 65 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1990 Ariz. LEXIS 197

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that this court cannot expand its statutory appellate jurisdiction by using its special action jurisdiction when a party has failed to timely file a notice of appeal
  • recognizing the “strong Arizona policy against using extraordinary writs as substitutes for appeals”
  • affirming the “strong Arizona policy against using extraordinary writs as substitutes for appeals”
  • “ ‘Subject matter jurisdiction’ relates to the constitutional or statutory power of a court to decide a case.”
  • “One of the equitable considerations involved in accepting special action jurisdiction is a petitioner’s showing of a need for speedy relief____”
  • motion for rehearing did not suspend time limit to appeal from underlying order granting new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corcoran, Gordon, Feldman, Cameron, Moeller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.