Skip to main content
· 2/7/2001

State ex rel. M.W.

Citations

  • 777 So. 2d 1290
  • 2001 WL 99594

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting “all of the operations” of a healthcare company to include an LLC it operated
  • “After the CRRA was passed, a plaintiff who had not been able to sue . . . because he was not an intended beneficiary of the specific program or activity receiving federal financial assistance now could sue.”
  • discussing the CRRA’s implications for Section 1557

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Drew, Peatross, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.