State ex rel. Murphy v. Coleman
Citations
- 71 Wash. 15
- 127 P. 568
- 1912 Wash. LEXIS 682
Syllabus
<p>Municipal Corporations — Improvements'—Special Assessments —Right to Compel Levy. A contractor on public work may maintain an action in mandamus to compel tbe city authorities to levy a special assessment to pay for the work, and is not compelled to resort to an action for damages for breach of the city’s contract.</p> <p>Pleading — Amendment—Discretion. Refusing permission to amend an answer upon sustaining a demurrer thereto, is within the discretion of the trial court, which will not be disturbed except for abuse; and no abuse appears, where the proposed amended answer states no additional facts or defenses material to the action not already pleaded in the original answer (Chadwick and Fullerton, JJ., dissenting).</p> <p>Municipal Corporations — Improvements — Contracts—Certificate by Engineer — Effect—Fraud. Where a contract for public work placed the same under the complete charge of the city engineer, making him an arbitrator between the contractor and the city, and required him to supervise the work as it progressed, and on the completion of the work, to make final estimates and give a written certificate of the amount due, and that, upon the filing of such certificate, the city council should proceed to levy assessments therefor, the city is bound by the engineer’s final certificate, even though it be fraudulently given, where the contractor did not participate in the fraud and was guilty of no collusion, and no complaint was made during the progress of the work.</p>
Judges: Chadwick, Crow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Murphy v. SummersettWashington Supreme Court· 1915-03-26· cited 11×
- Wheeler, Osgood Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1914-02-28· cited 10×
- Hutchinson v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court· 1913-02-08· cited 3×
- McGillivrae v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court· 1916-03-24· cited 3×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State ex rel. Brown v. McQuadeWashington Supreme Court· 1905-01-16· cited 45×
- School District No. 5 v. SageWashington Supreme Court· 1896-01-03· cited 21×
- State ex rel. Gillette v. ClausenWashington Supreme Court· 1906-11-19· cited 18×
- State ex rel. Barto v. Board of Drainage Commissioners of District No. 1Washington Supreme Court· 1907-06-22· cited 11×
- State ex rel. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1906-03-20· cited 10×
- Lake Erie & Western R. R. v. WaltersIndiana Court of Appeals· 1895-10-08· cited 9×
- Central Bitulithic Paving Co. v. City of Mt. ClemensMichigan Supreme Court· 1906-03-05· cited 9×
- Atwood v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1911-08-10· cited 8×
- De Mattos v. JordanWashington Supreme Court· 1898-12-06· cited 7×
- Morehouse v. Clerk of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court· 1912-09-07· cited 7×
- Skagit County v. TrowbridgeWashington Supreme Court· 1901-05-04· cited 6×
- Atkinson v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa· 1900-12-22· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.