State ex rel. Murdock v. Swigart

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Following defendant’s motion, it was incumbent upon plaintiff to rebut defendant’s showing by ‘point[ing] to an evidentiary conflict created on the record at least by a counter statement of a fact or facts set forth in details.’ ” (alteration in original, internal quotations omitted
• “Plaintiff’s evidence [that Army Corps of Engineers caused flooding], however, leaves gaping holes of logic in its chain of causation that are illuminated by the new declarations submitted by defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).