State ex rel. Muller v. Cyr
Citations
- 124 La. 603
- 50 So. 595
- 1909 La. LEXIS 509
Syllabus
<p>1. Schools and School Districts (§ 53*)— Removal of Members of School Board-Statutes — Construction.</p> <p>Under Acts 1902, p. 408, No. 214, § 6, providing that for incompetency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office the Governor may remove members of the parish boards of school directors, subject to the ratification of the State Board of Education, a removal by the state board is not a removal by the Governor; the action of the board, even though the Governor be a member and vote with the majority, not being his action, and his mere approval not satisfying the statute.</p> <p>2. Schools and School Districts (§ 53*)— Removal of Members of ScnooL Board-Causes — Statutes—Construction.</p> <p>Acts 1902, p. 408, No. 214, § 0, providing that for incompetency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office the Governor may remove members of the parish boards of school directors, is restrictive, and does not authorize a removal for “the deplorable condition of the school affairs of the parish,” since such condition may have resulted from causes entirely disconnected with any incompetency, etc., on the part of members of the board.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the company’s employment agreement did not prohibit the solicitation of prospective customers where the agreement prevented communication “‘with any individual, corporation or other entity which is a customer of AEROTEK’ under certain circumstances.”
- “If two provisions of a noncompete are distinct, divisible promises, a court may excise the offending provision.”
- “The ERC provision contains no parallel requirement that Aerotek submit to mediation at Obercian’s request, or a commitment on Aerotek’s part to mandatory mediation. Because this provision does not bind Aerotek, it lacks consideration.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Proyosty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.