State ex rel. Muller v. Brown
Citations
- 106 La. 437
Syllabus
<p>Syllabus.</p> <p>It being made the duty of the district attorney to represent the State In all < rlm Inal and civil actions in his district, he has the right to represent the State in magistrate’s courts on the trial of cases for assault; and this right, if denied to him by the magistrate, may be enforced by mandamus.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[B]road allegations regarding expense and capital cost data are insufficient, as plaintiffs do not identify what specific facts these data would have contained that contradicts [defendant’s] statement... .”
- “Given that [defendant’s] stock price increased on March 29, rather than decreased, it is far from clear that plaintiffs have met their burden as to loss causation -- even though that burden is a low one at the pleading stage.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Provosty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.