State ex rel. Moody v. Call
Citations
- 39 Fla. 165
Syllabus
<p>1. A person applying to be admitted as a party defendant in an action of ejectment, under section 11 of the Statute Geo. II, Cap. 19. must show by his application that his title is connected to and consistent with the possession of the occupier against whom such action is brought.</p> <p>3. The court has no power undev section 11 of the Statute Geo. II, Cap. 19, on the application of a third person claiming as landlord a right to be admitted as a party defendant, to vacate and set aside a default and a verdict and judgment already entered against the defendants in such suits.</p> <p>3. A peremptory writ of mandamus will be refused in all cases where the respondent can not be compelled to do all that is required by the alternative writ.</p>
Judges: Carter
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State ex rel. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Board of EqualizersSupreme Court of Florida· 1922-11-20· cited 78×
- Merchants Broom Co. v. ButlerSupreme Court of Florida· 1915-11-19· cited 20×
- State ex rel. Burr v. Tavarse & Gulf RailroadSupreme Court of Florida· 1919-08-12· cited 18×
- State ex rel. Davis v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of Florida· 1929-05-14· cited 6×
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.