Ohio Court of Appeals· 3/16/2023
State ex rel. Mobley v. O'Donnell
Citations
- 2023 Ohio 842
Syllabus
The magistrate did not err in determining that relator had an adequate remedy at law and therefore is not entitled to either a writ of mandamus or procedendo. Case dismissed.
Judges: Luper Schuster
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State ex rel. Pressley v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court· 1967-07-19· cited 1,186×
- State ex rel. Everhart v. McIntoshOhio Supreme Court· 2007-09-20· cited 162×
- State ex rel. Womack v. MarshOhio Supreme Court· 2011-01-25· cited 160×
- State ex rel. Levin v. City of Sheffield LakeOhio Supreme Court· 1994-08-24· cited 152×
- State v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court· 2012-05-03· cited 120×
- LeRoy v. Allen, Yurasek & MerklinOhio Supreme Court· 2007-07-18· cited 118×
- State ex rel. Ohio Republican Party v. FitzGerald (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-12-09· cited 92×
- State ex rel. Culgan v. CollierOhio Supreme Court· 2013-05-02· cited 70×
- Infinite Security Solutions, L.L.C. v. Karam Properties II, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-03-26· cited 61×
- State ex rel. Nyamusevya v. HawkinsOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-28· cited 50×
- T & M Machines, L.L.C. v. Atty. Gen.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-18· cited 35×
- J.S. v. L.S.Ohio Court of Appeals· 2022-07-19· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.