State ex rel. Mitchell v. Medler
Citations
- 17 N.M. 644
- 131 P. 976
Syllabus
<p>SYLLABUS (BY THE COURT)'.</p> <p>1. An action for the removal of an officer from office under the provisions of chapter 36, laws of 1909, is a civil and not a criminal proceeding.</p> <p>2. The words “immediately set down for trial” as used in sec. 12 of the Act, are not peremptory, but secure, merely, to the public and the defendant, a preference of right of trial over other eases, and impress upon the proceeding as much expedition as is within the power of the court.</p> <p>3. A writ of prohibition is not available as a writ of error, but is only available where there is a lack of jurisdiction.</p>
Judges: Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Board of Com'rs v. District Court of Fourth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1924-01-17· cited 19×
- State v. SantillanesNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1982-11-19· cited 16×
- Gilmore v. District Court of Fifth Judicial Dist.New Mexico Supreme Court· 1930-08-25· cited 14×
- State Ex Rel Delgado, Sheriff v. LeahyNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1924-11-24· cited 8×
- State ex rel. Houston v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court· 1921-12-13· cited 6×
- State Ex Rel. Stanley v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1938-03-01· cited 4×
- Loper v. ShumateSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1955-04-06· cited 3×
- State v. BurrCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1970-04-09· cited 2×
- State ex rel. Mansker v. LeibNew Mexico Supreme Court· 1915-09-07· cited 1×
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re FassettSupreme Court· 1892-01-11· cited 70×
- Skeen v. CraigUtah Supreme Court· 1906-08-02· cited 28×
- Wheeler v. DonnellCalifornia Supreme Court· 1896-01-08· cited 21×
- Kilburn v. LawCalifornia Supreme Court· 1896-02-08· cited 21×
- State v. LeachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1872-07-01· cited 18×
- People ex rel. Graver v. Circuit Court of Cook CountyIllinois Supreme Court· 1898-04-21· cited 7×
- State ex rel Brown v. Third Judicial District CourtUtah Supreme Court· 1904-02-25· cited 7×
- In Re EnglesSupreme Court· 1892-12-05· cited 4×
- Minnehaha County v. ThorneSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 1895-01-05· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.