Skip to main content
· 4/6/2010

State Ex Rel. Missouri Parks Ass'n v. Missouri Department of National Resources

Citations

  • 316 S.W.3d 375
  • 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 503
  • 2010 WL 1608839

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding initial judgment was rendered a nullity with the entry of the first amended judgment, and the first amended judgment was rendered a nullity with the entry of the second amended judgment
  • “Missouri courts do not issue opinions that have no practical effect and that are only advisory as to future, hypothetical situations.”
  • “The trial court's authority to enter amended judgments is a question of law which we review de novo.”
  • where a “Motion to Clarify the Judgment” alleged errors in the judgment’s language, the court found it was “tantamount to a motion to amend the judgment”
  • net effect of court’s actions is that the initial judgment and first-amended judgment “were each rendered a nullity upon entry of a subsequent judgment”; the second-amended judgment is the only judgment in the case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Newton, Smart, Martin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.