· 4/6/2010
State Ex Rel. Missouri Parks Ass'n v. Missouri Department of National Resources
Citations
- 316 S.W.3d 375
- 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 503
- 2010 WL 1608839
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding initial judgment was rendered a nullity with the entry of the first amended judgment, and the first amended judgment was rendered a nullity with the entry of the second amended judgment
- “Missouri courts do not issue opinions that have no practical effect and that are only advisory as to future, hypothetical situations.”
- “The trial court's authority to enter amended judgments is a question of law which we review de novo.”
- where a “Motion to Clarify the Judgment” alleged errors in the judgment’s language, the court found it was “tantamount to a motion to amend the judgment”
- net effect of court’s actions is that the initial judgment and first-amended judgment “were each rendered a nullity upon entry of a subsequent judgment”; the second-amended judgment is the only judgment in the case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newton, Smart, Martin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.