Supreme Court of Kansas· 1/19/1990
State Ex Rel. Meek v. Hays
Citations
- 785 P.2d 1356
- 246 Kan. 99
- 1990 Kan. LEXIS 19
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that doctrine of prescriptive easements for public highways extends to streams and rivers, and stressing that official action is required for public to obtain prescriptive easement for recreational purposes
- stating that doctrine of prescriptive easements for public highways extends to streams and rivers, and stressing that official action is required for public to obtain prescriptive easement for recreational purposes
- Phillips Petroleum did not alter state law regarding public rights in nonnavigable waters and did not authorize states to extend the public trust doctrine to nonnavigable waters
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lockett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest v. HassellCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-10-06· cited 52×
- Reitsma v. Pascoag Reservoir & Dam, LLCSupreme Court of Rhode Island· 2001-06-20· cited 36×
- Parks v. CooperSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2004-02-25· cited 27×
- Ace Equipment Sales, Inc. v. BuccinoSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2005-04-05· cited 11×
- Lee v. WilliamsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-30· cited 1×
- Attorney General Opinion No.Kansas Attorney General Reports· 2000-10-04
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- United States v. Holt State BankSupreme Court· 1926-02-01· cited 257×
- Oklahoma v. TexasSupreme Court· 1922-05-01· cited 214×
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1988-05-16· cited 117×
- Williams v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas· 1962-09-17· cited 56×
- People Ex Rel. Baker v. MacKCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1971-09-15· cited 47×
- Montana Coalition for Stream Access, Inc. v. CurranMontana Supreme Court· 1984-05-15· cited 46×
- Day v. ArmstrongWyoming Supreme Court· 1961-05-23· cited 43×
- Southern Idaho Fish & Game Ass'n v. Picabo Livestock, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court· 1974-12-18· cited 23×
- People v. EmmertSupreme Court of Colorado· 1979-07-02· cited 23×
- Dana v. HurstSupreme Court of Kansas· 1911-11-11· cited 22×
- State v. McIlroySupreme Court of Arkansas· 1980-03-17· cited 21×
- Wright v. SeymourCalifornia Supreme Court· 1886-03-23· cited 20×
- Kratina v. Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1976-04-10· cited 18×
- Kregar v. FogartySupreme Court of Kansas· 1908-07-03· cited 13×
- Buffalo River Conservation & Recreation Council v. National Park ServiceEighth Circuit· 1977-08-03· cited 11×
- Shanks v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 1917-10-06· cited 11×
- Kempf v. EllixsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 1976-05-28· cited 9×
- Piazzek v. Drainage District No. 1Supreme Court of Kansas· 1925-07-11· cited 8×
- Siler v. DreyerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1958-07-07· cited 5×
- Dougan v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas· 1935-04-06· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.